Violin Forum/Message Board Forum Index Violin Forum/Message Board
Provided by Violin Vision
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Using translucence to graduate tops and backs
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Violin Forum/Message Board Forum Index -> Violin Making and Restoration Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
CT Dolan
Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 143

PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 5:54 pm    Post subject: Using translucence to graduate tops and backs Reply with quote

Please check out the link below:

http://www.thestrad.com/downloads/TSRoth.pdf

Has anyone ever tried this method, or thought of doing so? I had a similar idea some time ago, and have had the intention to give it a try when I get to this point, but I sometimes still wonder if there is a point... If so, what are the salient characteristics one should seek? Is density directly related to translucence, as suggested? This seems a great way to go, such a great guide, but I'm a way off from trying it myself, from knowing if it would be of any value. If any of you have experience, or an opinion, please chime in.

Thanks,
Chris
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Darnton
Moderator


Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1347
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Sat Sep 05, 2009 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quite a few people have tried it. I didn't like it because wood isn't uniformly colored, so the resulting grads didn't relate to anything, but I think some people do it.

-------------

I see he goes for an even color. This could mean a lot of different things. The question I would have, though, is whether this assumed-preferable result is desirable or not?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Tim McTigue
Member


Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 30
Location: Ontario, Canada

PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I once read an article about a harpsichord maker who sought to learn the "secrets" of a particular maker of old. Sorry, I can't remember the name of either maker (I don't generally follow the harpsichord world to any extent), but the article stated that many of the most well-known harpsichord makers had tried to emulate the famous one, and had studied his harpsichords, but hadn't determined what it was that made them sound so much better. A curious detail was that his soundboards seemed to be rough-textured, and of arbitrary thickness, not smooth, and noone could figure out why. "Our hero" (the one about whom the article was written) decided that perhaps the seemingly-arbitrary differences in thickness had a purpose, and apparently figured out that it had to do with making the soundboard a uniform density, instead of thickness. He thicknessed his soundboards with a light behind, and basically scraped away where the annual rings were, so that the light shining through would be a uniform color. The article claimed that his harpsichords were world-renowned, and a very close approximation of the oringinal famous maker whom everyone sought to emulate. Anyway, that's what I remember of the substance of the article I read. Not sure if it's at all relevant to violin making, but it does show that this line of thought is not entirely out of left field...
_________________
Tim
-----------
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
CT Dolan
Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 143

PostPosted: Sun Sep 06, 2009 3:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Michael, your statements reflect my concerns on the matter quite accurately, regarding potential pitfalls of following this method (the very reasons I wondered whether or not there was a point to the method in the first place).

Tim, very interesting article you mention, from which it would appear we are not alone with regard to violins, and our striving to replicate the past.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dave Chandler
Super Member


Joined: 31 Oct 2007
Posts: 691
Location: Mt Mitchell in North Carolina

PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:22 pm    Post subject: Transluscence Reply with quote

I also thought I had discovered a quick and easy way to graduate my plates, but found that it more reflected the density of the wood in different areas. Now that I've invested in a graduating caliper discovered that my earlier plates were not nearly as evenly graduated as I thought. The only real value I can see, is with spruce you can tell quickly if you're down to within 5mm or so, but from there, its best to measure. Probably the best single investment so far, has been my caliper.
_________________
Dave in the Blue Ridge
Southern Violin Association

"Success is the ability to go from one failure to the next with no loss of enthusiasm" Winston Churchill

"I took the road less travelled, and now I don't know where I am." Marco Polo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Michael Darnton
Moderator


Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1347
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

But Dave, the real question is whether even graduations are desirable or not. The old guys didn't seem to think so.

This is a question I've been asking myself a lot lately, including the problem of whether they simply were doing what their technology allowed, or if they had some alternative strategy, like using light, for instance.

One thing that's certain, though is that the best violins don't have tops that are 2.5mm, + or - .05mm, but a lot of the not-best ones do. In fact one of the things I was trying to find out on the web yesterday was when the precision caliper of the type we use became available. I'm starting to think that when it came in was just about exactly when real quality went out. For instance, Vuillaume thought he would equal Stradivari by copying Stradivari, but one of the things he didn't copy was grads, because he had a "better" way of doing it precisely. His contemporaries Rocca and Pressenda are a lot more valuable now--but I don't think I have any grad charts of their instruments to compare. There are a number of similar instances, where I am thinking that precise grads have a specific result that I don't like, but I'm not certain yet what the alternative strategy would have been. . .

No answers on any of this at the moment, but I do have several experiments in that direction running, both on regrads and on my own violins.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Janito
Member


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 114
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If one accepts that many fine Cremonese have been regraduated in the epoc of precision instruments, and if they still sound superlative, where does this leave the imprecision of the original maker?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Darnton
Moderator


Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1347
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IF one accepts that. I don't, however, accept it wholesale. I think that if you have enough data (which I think I do) it's discoverable in many cases which have and have not been regraduated, reasonably accurately.

And it doesn't discount the value of the concept that varying grads are important if the regraduations haven't been + or - .05mm, no matter who did it. The bottom line, though, is that you hardly ever see an old Cremonese instrument which is, say, 2.5mm, exactly, all over its top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Janito
Member


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 114
Location: USA

PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exceptions can sometimes prove a rule.

Do you have any information on graduations where there is bearclaw or knots or wild grain?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Michael Darnton
Moderator


Joined: 23 Mar 2007
Posts: 1347
Location: Chicago

PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perhaps, but I don't see enough exceptions to use for developing any rules.

The makers I have been interested in did not use that type of wood.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
actonern
Super Member


Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 444

PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

One additional thing I've noticed in the "light through the wood" is that it isn't just density that can affect light transmission. It's also common for the spruce to have differences in resin content in certain areas of the plate, and the more resinous wood is a lot more "transluscent," even if the density is the same or very similar.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CT Dolan
Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2008
Posts: 143

PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

actonern wrote:
One additional thing I've noticed in the "light through the wood" is that it isn't just density that can affect light transmission. It's also common for the spruce to have differences in resin content in certain areas of the plate, and the more resinous wood is a lot more "transluscent," even if the density is the same or very similar.


Interesting observation...

One area of interest of mine has long been archery (bowhunting in particular). The reason I mention this is that there is a class of bows referred to as "self bows" (because they are not composite in any sense, being made as they are from a single piece of wood, taken down from a billet to a stave, and finally made into a bow). When making a self bow, one of the most important (and challenging) steps in the process is tillering, which is getting the bow to bend properly along the length of the limb (upper and lower), with no stiff spots or hinge points. Getting this right is absolutely essential for a long-lived, high-performance bow. You should know, however, that the goal is never uniformity of limb (only uniformity in the bending of the limb). Some of these bows can look quite wild, with limbs obviously lacking any uniformity when at rest, but they do have absolute uniformity of arc when braced, and as they are taken to full draw. The wood is master in the tillering process, the maker the slave. The wood totally dictates where it needs to be removed, and where it needs to remain. The cues are mostly visual, the maker observing very keenly the cause and effect relationship that develops as work progresses. There is very little room for error (and if perfection is the goal, indeed there is none!).

Anyway, the reason I mention this is that I believe there are some parallels with regard to what is being discussed in the posts above, and I also believe that just as with the making of self bows and taking the limbs down to their final "graduation", when graduating violins uniformity of form is not the goal to strive for, rather uniformity of function. The question that remains is, how?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Janito
Member


Joined: 08 Oct 2007
Posts: 114
Location: USA

PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You don't have to go as far as archery.

There is a school of bowmaking that uses a wire between head and frog to ensure perfect wood movement as the tension is increased (see my comment in Bowmaking section of forum).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
violinarius
Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

deleted

Last edited by violinarius on Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
violinarius
Member


Joined: 14 Dec 2007
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Tue Sep 08, 2009 8:09 pm    Post subject: Re: Using translucence to graduate tops and backs Reply with quote

deleted

Last edited by violinarius on Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:48 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Violin Forum/Message Board Forum Index -> Violin Making and Restoration Forum All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group