| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mat Roop Senior Member
Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 911 Location: Wyoming Ontario
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kjb Super Member
Joined: 06 Feb 2013 Posts: 385
|
Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You may know this already but I found out the hard way the the angle is not the only thing that you want to measure, you must measure the bridge height at the same time.
I made mine the correct angle and string length to the bridge and the saddle, which works fine for a limited number of arch heights.
I plan to add an adjustable bridge height post to what I have, and or a new one with adjustable angle, which if I am correct is not very hard to manufacture yourself, and more useful than what is in the link you gave.
perhaps others with more knowledge will correct me and stop me from making another mistake!! good luck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FiddleDoug Member
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 227 Location: Hilton, NY
|
Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The digital one that you show would most likely be too long. It might bump into parts of the tailpiece, and not allow you to get right down on the strings. You'll also notice on Darnton's, that right below the screw is a notch/offset to allow for the string height over the FB. _________________ Doug Wall
www.wallindependent.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L P Reedy Super Member
Joined: 02 Apr 2009 Posts: 276 Location: Brevard, NC
|
Posted: Sat Jun 08, 2013 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That looks like it could work very well if you shorten one leg and possibly modify the long end a little. More than I want to spend, though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mat Roop Senior Member
Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 911 Location: Wyoming Ontario
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|