| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ctviolin Super Member
Joined: 07 May 2009 Posts: 961 Location: Roswell
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 7:33 pm Post subject: General weight? |
|
|
I'm curious.
What do the makers here, usually get, or shoot for, for a finished (completed & strung up) violin weight?
I'd also be curious to know what particular woods different makers use, (as, the weight between domestic Englemann and Sitka spruces, just as one example, are radically different in weight) and what type of fittings do you usually use?
And, do you consider them of great importance (fittings) with regard to their eventual effect on performance?
For example - I'm curious how many makers habitually use full size - over the tail piece chin rests, and, if you do, do you prefer ebony over much lighter wood died black - etc?
Lastly, I'm curious if the final weight is usual or typical - or do you allow small, or maybe even large differences between violins due to things that might vary - or do you like very similar results in weight ?
Do many makers have a particular target weight they try for?
Thanks for any information offered,
Craig T _________________ Look,
Listen,
Learn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MANFIO Super Member

Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 458 Location: Sao Paulo
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, fittings will have an influence in the weight.
Here are some instruments that were weighted, the data is on the CD ROM about Venetian instruments. All are fully mounted, chinrest included, and the type of wood is mentioned:
Montagnana 1731, rosewood fittings: 463.8 grs.
Montagnana 1715, boxwood 403.7 grs.
Montagnana 1742, boxwood pegs and tailpiece, rosewood chinrest: 448
Gofriller, 1710, boxwood, 447 grs.
Gofriller, 1695, boxwood, 394 grs.
Gofriller 1700, ebony, 421.6 grs.
Gobetti 1714, boxwood, 446,6 grs.
Pietro Guarneri Venezia, 1730, boxwood 412 grs.
Santo Seraphin, boxwood, 435 grs.
S. Seraphin, boxwood, ebony chinrest, 432 grs.
Tononi 1718, ebony, 429 grs. _________________ www.manfio.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/7875988@N02/with/464604020/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MANFIO Super Member

Joined: 11 Apr 2007 Posts: 458 Location: Sao Paulo
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Michael Darnton Moderator
Joined: 23 Mar 2007 Posts: 1347 Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Of the Strads and del Gesus I've weighted, without chinrest but with everything else, the lightest was 360gms, the heaviest 420, and most ran around 390-400gms.
I used to work very carefully to weight, but when I started making heavy del Gesu models, had to give up that compulsion. _________________ new blog at my site! http://darntonviolins.com/blog
my work sites: http://darntonviolins.com and http://darntonhersh.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
okawbow Member
Joined: 31 Mar 2009 Posts: 63 Location: Southern Illinois
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 9:58 pm Post subject: weight |
|
|
| My best sounding del Gesu model weighs 454 gr fully dressed. My sweetest sounding large Strad model weights 544gr! Both are red maple and engleman, ebony fittings. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DonLeister Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2007 Posts: 383 Location: Richmond, VA
|
Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the Cannone is 434g w/o chin rest but with everything else.
I can't say I shoot for certain weight for a violin but I do like to have my tops below 70 white / w/ bar. But I will allow heavier up to upper 70's if the top is getting thin, like much of it under 2.5.
Backs I like to see 105-110 but I'm not stuck on that. I like my violins to respond quickly and less weight helps that but at a cost. I'm trying some arching and thickness schemes to help encourage some resilience and strength under the bow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kubasa Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow, that is quite a list Luis! Here I was fretting over my latest instrument being around 460 with the fittings but now I don't feel so bad, considering that I used sugar maple which obviously makes it heavier right from the start. Very interesting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
violinarius Member
Joined: 14 Dec 2007 Posts: 171
|
Posted: Wed May 08, 2013 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't aim for a particular target weight.
I use weight as a general guide. It tells me roughly where I am.
I think weight would be more helpful to someone that is extremely selective in choosing their wood, that rejects anything other than wood of the same density. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kubasa Member
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 212
|
Posted: Sun May 19, 2013 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While looking for something else, I came across this amazing article on weights. I actually don't remember what I went looking for in the first place....I'm guessing many of you have seen this but it's the first I've seen of this. Now, I need to buckle down and spend some time studying it. I wanted to share the link:
http://waddleviolins.com/downloads/Weights_Nov2003CASJournal.pdf |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ctviolin Super Member
Joined: 07 May 2009 Posts: 961 Location: Roswell
|
Posted: Mon May 20, 2013 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kubasa wrote: |
While looking for something else, I came across this amazing article on weights.
Now, I need to buckle down and spend some time studying it. I wanted to share the link:
|
Yes kubasa, and coveing some interesting data, and, areas I was interested in when I first posted the question.
I believe that I'll spend some time with this article also ...
Thanks for posting it,
ct _________________ Look,
Listen,
Learn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|