| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jethro Member
Joined: 07 Apr 2007 Posts: 178
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack H. Super Member
Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 346 Location: Israel
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks Very nice Jethro!
Keep up the fine work!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mikes Member
Joined: 28 Mar 2007 Posts: 80 Location: Vermont, USA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excellent Jethro, your violins are looking very nice! Maybe stray away from the Strobel model for your next one?
Mike S |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jethro Member
Joined: 07 Apr 2007 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:36 am Post subject: strobel ! |
|
|
I am about 1/2 way through violin 3 so I am committed to strobel on it.
I like the strobel result allthough it is VERY LOUD... allmost too loud.
"Violino" strings are the only ones which seem to "calm" the vollume
down, but they seem to be resistive past about 1/2 way up the neck
in the high positions. Tried dominants but didn't like the sound or price.
Running helicores on it now. They don't seem ideal either. Loud !
I have not tried real gut yet !
I have 2 really nice backs that the center joints failed. I may re-join
them and design another inside mold which is about 1/4 inch narrower
to fit the backs. Any idea how I should account for the narrowness ?
Should I make the ribs a little thick to maintain the air vollume ?
or should I keep the ribs normal and raise the plate frequencys a little ?
Seems like I have seen some of the 16-th century violins that appeared
to be narower than average. Don't remember what they were.
Hate to let beautifull backs go to waste !
Tim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChameleonMan Member

Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 41 Location: Florida, US
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Your violin is absolutely magnificent! Great job! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
M.Lange Member

Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 81 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Very nice work!
The corners may be a little bit too long for the Strobel model. But that's not a problem, as long as you don't hit it with the frog when playing the e-string.
Matthias |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jethro Member
Joined: 07 Apr 2007 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 1:46 am Post subject: corner work |
|
|
The corners and purfling are better on #2 than on 1. But I have noticed that the corner outline on #2 while much better is still lacking the beauty
and grace of many I see in pictures. It seems like a VERY small change in the curves in the corners causes that certain perfect shape to be visualy
astheticly lost. I guess It will get better with more made !
Also the topography of the plates as you near the edge (channel) seems
to be visualy sensative too. The first violin all most didn't have a channel.
But at each step through the build my choices were throw it away or keep going and see where the think took me. Glad I didn't smash it like in the
"red Violin" movie !
Now building the back plate for #3 using a 1 piece back.
Thanks for the comments !
Tim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|